Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 30
Filter
1.
Pediatric Hematology Oncology Journal ; 7(2):52-53, 2022.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2320584
2.
Pediatric Hematology Oncology Journal ; 8(1):1-3, 2023.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2315708

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Wolman disease is a rare genetic disorder with an autosomal recessive inheritance. A mutation in the LIPA gene causes lysosomal acid lipase (LAL) deficiency results in lipid storage and adrenal insufficiency. Death in early infancy is due to liver failure. Patients and methods: We describe the clinical course of a three-month-old infant diagnosed with Wolman disease. A rapid mutational analysis confirmed a LIPA gene defect. Results: He underwent matched unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) at 3 months of age, with a treosulfan-based conditioning, which resulted in engraftment with donor-derived hematopoietic cells. He required supportive care for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and mucositis. He was administered low dose prednisolone for grade I skin graft versus host disease, and a complete donor chimerism was documented on several occasions. At one year post HSCT, his growth and development were optimal, and there was no hepatosplenomegaly. He is maintained on glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid supplements for primary hypoaldosteronism. Conclusion: The case emphasizes the timely diagnosis and the potential for successful treatment of Wolman disease by HSCT. © 2022 Pediatric Hematology Oncology Chapter of Indian Academy of Pediatrics

3.
Kliniceskaa Mikrobiologia i Antimikrobnaa Himioterapia ; 24(3):196-201, 2022.
Article in Russian | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2303890

ABSTRACT

Objective. To assess the course and outcomes of COVID-19 in recipients of allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 44 adult recipients (allogeneic - 33 [75%] and autologous - 11 [25%] of HSCT who diagnosed with COVID-19 after transplantation. Group mostly represented by acute leukemia - 18 (41%) and lymphoma - 10 (22.7%). The median follow-up time since the development of COVID-19 was 231 days (1-818 days), after HSCT - 507.5 days (14-3723 days). Overall and progression-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and Log-Rank method. We also evaluated the characteristics of the course of a new coronavirus infection. Results. Median time for the development of COVID-19 from the moment of HSCT was 122.5 days (-1-3490 days). Twelve patients (27.2%) were in grade 3-4 neutropenia at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 16 (36.4%) patients were in grade 1-2 neutropenia. Sixteen (48.4%) allo-HSCT recipients had active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at the time of COVID-19 development. Disease severity was mild in 19 (43.2%) and moderate in 13 (29.5%) patients. Overall, 200-day survival from the onset of COVID-19 was 78.8% (95% CI [63.1-88.4]). Anemia (p = 0.02) and thrombocytopenia (p = 0.01) significantly decrease OS in patients with COVID-19 after HSCT. Patients with GVHD at the time of COVID-19 onset had a better survival rate (p = 0.02). The timing of COVID-19 development after HSCT did not affect outcomes. Conclusions. The key points of the course of COVID-19 in HSCT recipients are the presence of cytopenia and graft-versus-host disease. Overall survival was 78.8%.Copyright © 2022, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

4.
Kliniceskaa Mikrobiologia i Antimikrobnaa Himioterapia ; 23(3):226-238, 2021.
Article in Russian | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2301951

ABSTRACT

Over the last decade, the introduction of new antifungal drugs and diagnostic procedures has improved the prognosis of hematological patients with invasive fungal disease (IFD), primarily invasive aspergillosis. Despite effective antifungal prophylaxis against the most common IFD caused by Aspergillus spp., rates of IFD due to rare pathogens being resistant to most antifungal drugs, including mucormycosis have been increased. The main group of patients having a high risk of mucormycosis is deeply immunocompromised patients who received chemotherapy for acute leukemia, patients undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, or treated with corticosteroids for graft-versushost disease. Currently, the urgency of this complication is significantly higher due to COVID-19 pandemic and extensive use of corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19. Despite the fact that the criteria for the diagnosis of IFD EORTC/MSG 2008 and 2020 have been developed and implemented into practice in most countries, mucormycosis still remains a difficult-to-diagnose IFD, where the factor of rapid diagnosis is a main factor of treatment success. Medications available for the treatment of IFD include polyenes, triazoles, and echinocandins. For a long time, the drug of choice for the treatment of mucormycosis was liposomal amphotericin B. However, a new effective drug has been approved for the treatment of both mucormycosis and IFD, caused by multiple pathogens - isavuconazole. This review presents new data on the epidemiology of mucormycosis, diagnosis approaches and current international treatment guidelines.Copyright © 2021, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

5.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1125030, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2253359

ABSTRACT

Background: The outcome of COVID-19 in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients is almost uniformely considered poor. The aim of present study was to retrospectively analyse the outcome and risk factors for mortality in a large series of patients who developed COVID-19 infection after an allogeneic HSCT. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study promoted by the European Hematology Association - Infections in Hematology Study Working Group, included 326 adult HSCT patients who had COVID-19 between January 2020 and March 2022. Results: The median time from HSCT to the diagnosis of COVID-19 was 268 days (IQR 86-713; range 0-185 days). COVID-19 severity was mild in 21% of the patients, severe in 39% and critical in 16% of the patients. In multivariable analysis factors associated with a higher risk of mortality were, age above 50 years, presence of 3 or more comorbidities, active hematologic disease at time of COVID-19 infection, development of COVID-19 within 12 months of HSCT, and severe/critical infections. Overall mortality rate was 21% (n=68): COVID-19 was the main or secondary cause of death in 16% of the patients (n=53). Conclusions: Mortality in HSCT recipients who develop COVID-19 is high and largely dependent on age, comorbidities, active hematologic disease, timing from transplant and severity of the infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematologic Diseases , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Adult , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/etiology , Hematologic Diseases/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Stem Cell Transplantation
6.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 29(5): 337.e1-337.e5, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2221075

ABSTRACT

The role of donor and recipient Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immunologic status pre-transplantation has not been fully investigated in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. Given the poor immunogenicity to vaccines in this population and the serious outcomes of COVID-19, adoptive transfer of immunity may offer important insight into improving protection for this vulnerable population. In this study, we evaluated the role of adoptive transfer of immunity at 1 month post-transplantation and 6 months post-transplantation after vaccination of recipients, based on pre-transplantation severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination and infection exposures of both recipient and donor. Using banked specimens from related donor allogeneic HSCT recipients and clinical data from both donors and recipients, anti-Spike (S) IgG titers were analyzed at 1, 3, and 6 months post-transplantation according to prior SARS-CoV-2 immunologic exposures. Recipients were excluded if they had received SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies or had infection in the first 6 months post-transplantation. Of the 53 recipient-donor pairs, 29 donors and 24 recipients had prior SARS-CoV-2 immunologic exposure. Recipient-donor pairs with no prior SARS-CoV-2 exposure (D0R0) had significantly lower anti-S IgG titers at 1 month compared to those with prior exposures (D1R1) (D0R0: median, 2.43 [interquartile range (IQR), .41 to 3.77]; D1R1: median, 8.42; IQR, 5.58 to 12.20]; P = .008). At 6 months, anti-S IgG titers were higher in recipients who were vaccinated at 3 months post-transplantation in the D1R1 cohort (median IgG, 148.34; IQR, 92.36 to 204.33) compared with the D0R0 cohort (median IgG, 38.74; IQR, 8.93 to 119.71). Current strategies should be optimized to enhance SARS-CoV-2 protection for HSCT recipients, including augmentation of the immune response for both donors and recipients prior to transplantation.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Vaccination , Antibodies, Viral , Immunoglobulin G
7.
Kliniceskaa Mikrobiologia i Antimikrobnaa Himioterapia ; 24(3):196-201, 2022.
Article in Russian | Scopus | ID: covidwho-2206321

ABSTRACT

Objective. To assess the course and outcomes of COVID-19 in recipients of allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 44 adult recipients (allogeneic – 33 [75%] and autologous – 11 [25%] of HSCT who diagnosed with COVID-19 after transplantation. Group mostly represented by acute leukemia – 18 (41%) and lymphoma – 10 (22.7%). The median follow-up time since the development of COVID-19 was 231 days (1–818 days), after HSCT – 507.5 days (14–3723 days). Overall and progression-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier and Log-Rank method. We also evaluated the characteristics of the course of a new coronavirus infection. Results. Median time for the development of COVID-19 from the moment of HSCT was 122.5 days (-1–3490 days). Twelve patients (27.2%) were in grade 3–4 neutropenia at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 16 (36.4%) patients were in grade 1–2 neutropenia. Sixteen (48.4%) allo-HSCT recipients had active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at the time of COVID-19 development. Disease severity was mild in 19 (43.2%) and moderate in 13 (29.5%) patients. Overall, 200-day survival from the onset of COVID-19 was 78.8% (95% CI [63.1–88.4]). Anemia (p = 0.02) and thrombocytopenia (p = 0.01) significantly decrease OS in patients with COVID-19 after HSCT. Patients with GVHD at the time of COVID-19 onset had a better survival rate (p = 0.02). The timing of COVID-19 development after HSCT did not affect outcomes. Conclusions. The key points of the course of COVID-19 in HSCT recipients are the presence of cytopenia and graft-versus-host disease. Overall survival was 78.8%. © 2022, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

8.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(1)2023 Jan 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2200962

ABSTRACT

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had a devastating impact on the world's population in the years 2020−2022. The rapid development of vaccines enabled a reduction in the mortality and morbidity of COVID-19, but there are limited data about their effects on immunocompromised children. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the mRNA BNT162b2 (Pfizer/Biontech) vaccine in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Material and methods: Two cohorts of 34 children after allo-HSCT and 35 healthy children aged 5−11 years were vaccinated with two doses of the mRNA BNT162b2 (10 µg) vaccine. All children were evaluated for adverse effects with electronic surveys and the immunogenicity of the vaccine was assessed with anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titer measurements. Results: All reported adverse events (AEs) were classified as mild. The most common AE was pain at the injection site. All the other AEs (both local and systemic) were rarely reported (<15% patients). Both groups showed a similar response in anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG production. Patients after allo-HSCT that were undergoing immunosuppressive treatment presented a poorer immunological response than patients off of treatment. Time since HSCT, patient age, lymphocyte count, and total IgG concentration did not correlate with initial/post-vaccination anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers. Most patients who were eligible for a third dose of the vaccine had an excellent humoral response observed after two vaccine doses. Conclusions: The COVID-19 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine is very well tolerated and highly immunogenic in 5−11-year-old children after HSCT. Children >2 years of age after HSCT who did not receive immunosuppressive treatment presented excellent antibody production after two doses of the vaccine, but children on immunosuppression may require a more intense vaccination schedule.

9.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob ; 2022 Oct 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2061406

ABSTRACT

Background & Objectives: SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which can range from a mild illness to a severe phenotype characterised by acute respiratory distress, needing mechanical ventilation. Children with combined immunodeficiencies might be unable to mount a sufficient cellular and humoral immune response against Covid-19 and have persistent disease. The authors describe a child with combined immunodeficiency, with favorable post-HSCT course following a haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplant in the presence of persistent SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods & results: A 13-month-old girl with MHC class II deficiency developed persistent pre-HSCT SARS-CoV-2 infection. Faced with a significant challenge of balancing the risk of progressive infection due to incompetent immune system with the danger of inflammatory pneumonitis peri-immune reconstitution post-HSCT, she underwent a maternal (with a recent history of Covid-19 infection) haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplant. The patient received Regdanvimab® (post stem cell infusion) and Remdesivir (pre and post stem cell infusion). We noted a gradual increase in the Ct (cycle threshold) values, implying reduction in viral RNA with concomitant expansion in the CD3 lymphocyte subset and clinical/radiological improvement. Conclusions: Combination of adoptive transfer of maternal CD45RO+ memory add-back T-lymphocytes after haploidentical HSCT, use of Regdanvimab® (SARS-CoV-2 neutralising monoclonal antibody) and Remdesivir may have led to the successful outcome in our patient with severe immunodeficiency, undergoing HSCT. Our case highlights the role of novel antiviral strategies (monoclonal antibodies and CD45RO+ memory T-lymphocytes) in contributing to viral clearance in a challenging clinical scenario.

10.
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol ; 35(3): 101399, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2060442

ABSTRACT

HSCT recipients are at increased risk for COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality. Early treatment of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection is an important means to decreasing risk for severe disease and death. While some HSCT recipients, particularly those who are early post-transplant and severely immunosuppressed, may have diminished response to COVID-19 vaccines, the benefits of vaccination are uncontested. Public health, healthcare facility and individual level approaches are all necessary to mitigate risk for infection in this vulnerable population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects
11.
Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia ; 22:S193, 2022.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-2042255

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has been a trying period, with an increased risk of infections and post-disease complications in patients with leukemia, particularly transplant candidates. Not enough studies have shown the effects of doing HSCT in recently treated COVID patients, nor the appropriate interval in which transplant can be safely done. We are then presented with a case of Relapsed/Refractory T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-cell ALL) in an adult patient, given 2 cycles of Nelarabine in preparation for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT). In the interim of preparing for transplant, he incurred COVID-19 pneumonia that was categorized as moderate. He was immediately admitted for transplant within 3 weeks post-recovery from COVID, with successful engraftment and discharge on the 26th-day post-transplant. Although recent NICE and EMBT guidelines have recommended that transplant for recently recovered moderate or severe COVID-19 should be at minimum 3 months post-recovery, we have seen from this case that it is possible to do HSCT post COVID-19 infection within a shorter interval as recommended. Compared also to patients who were treated pre-pandemic, the protocol and complications experienced post-transplant did not differ from this patient who was treated during the pandemic, recovered from post-COVID pneumonia.

12.
Viruses ; 14(9)2022 08 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2006230

ABSTRACT

Immunocompromised individuals generally fail to mount efficacious immune humoral responses following vaccination. The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern has raised the question as to whether levels of anti-spike protein antibodies achieved after two or three doses of the vaccine efficiently protect against breakthrough infection in the context of immune suppression. We used a fluorescence-based neutralization assay to test the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 variants (ancestral variant, Beta, Delta, and Omicron BA.1) to the neutralizing response induced by vaccination in highly immunosuppressed allogeneic HSCT recipients, tested after two and three doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine. We show that neutralizing antibody responses to the Beta and Delta variants in most immunocompromised HSCT recipients increased after three vaccine doses up to values similar to those observed in twice-vaccinated healthy adults and were significantly lower against Omicron BA.1. Overall, neutralization titers correlated with the amount of anti-S-RBD antibodies measured by means of enzyme immunoassay, indicating that commercially available assays can be used to quantify the anti-S-RBD antibody response as a reliable surrogate marker of humoral immune protection in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals. Our findings support the recommendation of additional early vaccine doses as a booster of humoral neutralizing activity against emerging variants, in HSCT immunocompromised patients. In the context of Omicron circulation, it further emphasizes the need for reinforcement of preventive measures including the administration of monoclonal antibodies in this high-risk population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Viral Vaccines , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral , Antibody Formation , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Int J Hematol ; 115(5): 611-615, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1990780

ABSTRACT

We evaluated anti-spike protein antibody (anti-S) production in 130 hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients who received the coronavirus disease-2019 vaccine. Sixty-five received allo-HSCT and 65 received auto-HSCT. Disease-specific treatments were being administered to 43.1% of allo-HSCT and 69.2% of auto-HSCT patients. Seropositivity was observed in 87.7% of allo-HSCT and 89.2% in auto-HSCT patients. Anti-S antibody production was significantly impaired in auto-HSCT patients compared with controls (178U/mL [0.4-4990.0] vs. 669 U/mL [40.3-4377.0], p < 0.001), but not in allo-HSCT patients (900 U/mL [0.4-12,893.0] vs. 860 U/mL [40.3-8988.0], P = 0.659). Clinically relevant anti-S antibody levels (> 264 U/mL) were achieved in 59.2% of patients (76.9% in allo-HSCT and 41.5% in auto-HSCT). The main factors influencing the protective level of the antibody response were the CD19 + cell count and serum immunoglobulin G levels, and these were significant in both allo-HSCT and auto-HSCT patients. Other factors included time since HSCT, complete remission status, use of immunosuppressive drugs, and levels of lymphocyte subsets including CD4, CD8 and CD56 positive cells, but these were only significant in allo-HSCT patients. Allo-HSCT patients had a relatively favorable antibody response, while auto-HSCT patients had poorer results.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Antibody Formation , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation, Autologous , Transplantation, Homologous
14.
J Hematol Oncol ; 15(1): 81, 2022 06 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1962866

ABSTRACT

Recipients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy are at increased risk for unfavorable outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection. The efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines remains undetermined in this vulnerable population, we therefore conducted a pooled analysis to evaluate the immune response after vaccination. A total of 46 studies were finally included, comprising 4757 HSCT and 174 CAR-T recipients. Our results indicated that HSCT and CAR-T recipients had an attenuated immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination compared with healthy individuals, while time interval between transplant and vaccination, immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and lymphocyte counts at vaccination significantly affected the humoral response in HSCT recipients. In addition, seroconversion was significantly higher in patients with BCMA-based CAR-T than those with CD19-based CAR-T. Thus, an adapted vaccination strategy for HSCT and CAR-T recipients may be required, and further research on the effect of a booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine and the role of cellular response after vaccination is warranted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Receptors, Chimeric Antigen , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Humans , Immunity , Immunotherapy, Adoptive/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
15.
Eur J Radiol Open ; 9: 100431, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1906978

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To compare temporal evolution of imaging features of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza in computed tomography and evaluate their predictive value for distinction. Methods: In this retrospective, multicenter study 179 CT examinations of 52 COVID-19 and 44 influenza critically ill patients were included. Lung involvement, main pattern (ground glass opacity, crazy paving, consolidation) and additional lung and chest findings were evaluated by two independent observers. Additional findings and clinical data were compared patient-wise. A decision tree analysis was performed to identify imaging features with predictive value in distinguishing both entities. Results: In contrast to influenza patients, lung involvement remains high in COVID-19 patients > 14 days after the diagnosis. The predominant pattern in COVID-19 evolves from ground glass at the beginning to consolidation in later disease. In influenza there is more consolidation at the beginning and overall less ground glass opacity (p = 0.002). Decision tree analysis yielded the following: Earlier in disease course, pleural effusion is a typical feature of influenza (p = 0.007) whereas ground glass opacities indicate COVID-19 (p = 0.04). In later disease, particularly more lung involvement (p < 0.001), but also less pleural (p = 0.005) and pericardial (p = 0.003) effusion favor COVID-19 over influenza. Regardless of time point, less lung involvement (p < 0.001), tree-in-bud (p = 0.002) and pericardial effusion (p = 0.01) make influenza more likely than COVID-19. Conclusions: This study identified differences in temporal evolution of imaging features between COVID-19 and influenza. These findings may help to distinguish both diseases in critically ill patients when laboratory findings are delayed or inconclusive.

16.
Br J Haematol ; 198(4): 668-679, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1874397

ABSTRACT

Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients remain at high risk of adverse outcomes from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and emerging variants. The optimal prophylactic vaccine strategy for this cohort is not defined. T cell-mediated immunity is a critical component of graft-versus-tumour effect and in determining vaccine immunogenicity. Using validated anti-spike (S) immunoglobulin G (IgG) and S-specific interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot (IFNγ-ELIspot) assays we analysed response to a two-dose vaccination schedule (either BNT162b2 or ChAdOx1) in 33 HSCT recipients at ≤2 years from transplant, alongside vaccine-matched healthy controls (HCs). After two vaccines, infection-naïve HSCT recipients had a significantly lower rate of seroconversion compared to infection-naïve HCs (25/32 HSCT vs. 39/39 HCs no responders) and had lower S-specific T-cell responses. The HSCT recipients who received BNT162b2 had a higher rate of seroconversion compared to ChAdOx1 (89% vs. 74%) and significantly higher anti-S IgG titres (p = 0.022). S-specific T-cell responses were seen after one vaccine in HCs and HSCT recipients. However, two vaccines enhanced S-specific T-cell responses in HCs but not in the majority of HSCT recipients. These data demonstrate limited immunogenicity of two-dose vaccination strategies in HSCT recipients, bolstering evidence of the need for additional boosters and/or alternative prophylactic measures in this group.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Age Factors , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , BNT162 Vaccine/immunology , BNT162 Vaccine/therapeutic use , Bone Marrow Transplantation/adverse effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/pharmacology , COVID-19 Vaccines/therapeutic use , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/immunology , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/therapeutic use , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Immunity, Cellular/drug effects , Immunity, Cellular/immunology , Immunity, Humoral/drug effects , Immunity, Humoral/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Seroconversion , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects , Vaccination/adverse effects
17.
Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine ; 87:1106-1115, 2022.
Article in English | Academic Search Complete | ID: covidwho-1824083

ABSTRACT

Background: Patients with hematological disorders especially those who underwent bone marrow transplantation are known for having some degree of immune system derangement and cytokine signaling instability as well as patients who were diagnosed with active malignancy and needed chemotherapy. Objective: The study aimed to compare the outcome between patients infected with COVID 19 who use immune suppression (either acute or chronic immune suppression) to fight COVID infection and how our different bodies and immune systems can handle it versus the normal population. Patients and Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study in December 2020 conducted on 96 subjects who caught COVID-19 infection, the subjects were categorized into three groups: Group 1: consists of 32 patients who underwent BMT (patients on chronic immunosuppressive drugs), Group 2: consists of 32 patients with hematological diseases (patients on chemotherapy or acute immunosuppressive drugs), and Group 3: control group (non-immunosuppressed patients) consists of 32 patients with patients had symptomatic COVID-19 infections requiring hospital admission. Results: We found improved overall survival in group 1 with 4 out of the total 32 patients succumbed to their deaths, 2 of the 4 patients were in the peri-engraftment period with the statistically significant improved OS when compared to patients in group 2 with a P-value of 0.038. Conclusion: Acute immune suppression is done by chemotherapy worsen the outcome of COVID-19 infection, while chronic immunosuppression had the best outcome in COVID-19 patients even better than the normal population due to loss of immune cell signaling and absent cytokines storm that might occur. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine is the property of Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)

18.
Eur J Immunol ; 52(7): 1194-1197, 2022 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1777549

ABSTRACT

Little is known about the cellular immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients after HSCT and B-NHL with iatrogenic B-cell aplasia. In nonseroconverted HSCT patients, induction of specific T-cell responses was assessed. The majority of allogeneic HSCT patients not showing humoral responses to vaccination also fail to mount antigen-specific T-cell responses.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Immunity, Cellular , Immunity, Humoral , SARS-CoV-2 , T-Lymphocytes , Vaccination
19.
Kliniceskaa Mikrobiologia i Antimikrobnaa Himioterapia ; 23(3):226-238, 2021.
Article in Russian | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1772231

ABSTRACT

Over the last decade, the introduction of new antifungal drugs and diagnostic procedures has improved the prognosis of hematological patients with invasive fungal disease (IFD), primarily invasive aspergillosis. Despite effective antifungal prophylaxis against the most common IFD caused by Aspergillus spp., rates of IFD due to rare pathogens being resistant to most antifungal drugs, including mucormycosis have been increased. The main group of patients having a high risk of mucormycosis is deeply immunocompromised patients who received chemotherapy for acute leukemia, patients undergoing allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, or treated with corticosteroids for graft-versushost disease. Currently, the urgency of this complication is significantly higher due to COVID-19 pandemic and extensive use of corticosteroids for the treatment of COVID-19. Despite the fact that the criteria for the diagnosis of IFD EORTC/MSG 2008 and 2020 have been developed and implemented into practice in most countries, mucormycosis still remains a difficult-to-diagnose IFD, where the factor of rapid diagnosis is a main factor of treatment success. Medications available for the treatment of IFD include polyenes, triazoles, and echinocandins. For a long time, the drug of choice for the treatment of mucormycosis was liposomal amphotericin B. However, a new effective drug has been approved for the treatment of both mucormycosis and IFD, caused by multiple pathogens – isavuconazole. This review presents new data on the epidemiology of mucormycosis, diagnosis approaches and current international treatment guidelines. © 2021, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

20.
Front Microbiol ; 12: 789774, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1595513

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted genetic vaccination as a powerful and cost-effective tool to counteract infectious diseases. Invasive fungal infections (IFI) remain a major challenge among immune compromised patients, particularly those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic bone marrow transplantation (HSCT) or solid organ transplant (SOT) both presenting high morbidity and mortality rates. Candidiasis and Aspergillosis are the major fungal infections among these patients and the failure of current antifungal therapies call for new therapeutic aids. Vaccination represents a valid alternative, and proof of concept of the efficacy of this approach has been provided at clinical level. This review will analyze current understanding of antifungal immunology, with a particular focus on genetic vaccination as a suitable strategy to counteract these diseases.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL